Strategic Deployment of Cardiology Fellows in Training Using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Coronavirus Disease 2019 Framework.

Coronavirus disease 2019 is a global pandemic affecting >3 million people in >170 countries, resulting in >200 000 deaths; 35% to 40% of patients and deaths are in the United States. The coronavirus disease 2019 crisis is placing an enormous burden on health care in the United States, including residency and fellowship training programs. The balance between mitigation, training and education, and patient care is the ultimate determinant of the role of cardiology fellows in training during the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis. On March 24, 2020, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education issued a formal response to the pandemic crisis and described a framework for operation of graduate medical education programs. Guidance for deployment of cardiology fellows in training during the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis is based on the principles of a medical mission, and adherence to preparation, protection, and support of our fellows in training. The purpose of this review is to describe our departmental strategic deployment of cardiology fellows in training using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education framework for pandemic preparedness.

Specialist valve clinic in a cardiac centre: 10-year experience.

Aims: Guidelines recommend specialist valve clinics as best practice for the assessment and conservative management of patients with heart valve disease. However, there is little guidance on how to set up and organise a clinic. The aim of this study is to describe a clinic run by a multidisciplinary team consisting of cardiologists, physiologist/scientists and a nurse. Methods: The clinical and organisational aims of the clinic, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and links with other services are described. The methods of training non-clinical staff are detailed. Data were prospectively entered onto a database and the study consisted of an analysis of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of all patients seen between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018. Results: There were 2126 new patients and 9522 visits in the 10-year period. The mean age was 64.8 and 55% were male. Of the visits, 3587 (38%) were to the cardiologists, 4092 (43%) to the physiologist/scientists and 1843 (19%) to the nurse. The outcomes from the cardiologist clinics were cardiology follow-up in 460 (30%), referral for surgery in 354 (23%), referral to the physiologist/scientist clinic in 412 (27%) or to the nurse clinic in 65 (4.3%) and discharge in 230 (15%). The cardiologist needed to see 6% from the nurse clinic and 10% from the physiologist/scientist clinic, while advice alone was sufficient in 10% and 9%. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary specialist valve clinic is feasible and sustainable in the long term.

Cardiogenic Shock in Perioperative and Intraoperative Settings: A Team Approach.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a multifactorial disease process with high morbidity and mortality. When it occurs in a peri- or intraoperative setting, factors such as surgery, anesthesia, and post-surgical physiology can negatively affect patient outcomes. Since patient needs often escalate during CS-from medications to mechanical support to palliative care-this disease demands a multidisciplinary approach that encompasses all aspects of medical delivery. Preliminary studies have indicated that a multidisciplinary team approach to CS results in earlier diagnosis and treatment and improves patient outcomes. Here we discuss various management strategies for CS from an anesthesiology, surgery, and critical care perspective.

Impact of care coordination on oral anticoagulant therapy among patients with atrial fibrillation in routine clinical practice in Japan: a prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Care coordination between general practitioners (GPs) and cardiovascular specialists is expected to play a key role in establishing appropriate oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of care coordination on oral anticoagulant therapy in the management of AF in Japan. METHODS: This study was a multi-center, single-arm, prospective cohort study with retrospective chart and claims data review for historical controls. The study included three study periods: a 12-month pre-campaign period; a 12-month campaign period for AF screening and care coordination; and a 3-month post-campaign period for follow-up of care coordination. During the campaign period, patients aged ≥65 years who attended participating GP clinics underwent opportunistic AF screening by GPs under the campaign. At the discretion of the GP, newly diagnosed AF patients after the screening were referred to a cardiovascular specialist for care coordination. To assess the impact of care coordination and evaluate the effects of the campaign, implementation of care coordination, antithrombotic therapies, and patient-reported outcomes were compared between patients with and without care coordination, and between patients during the pre-campaign and campaign periods. RESULTS: There were 86 newly diagnosed AF patients during the pre-campaign period and 90 during the campaign period. The percentage of patients with care coordination increased from 3.5% (3/86) in the pre-campaign period to 14.4% (n = 13/90) during the campaign period. The percentage of patients who received OAC therapies, according to the definition from the Japanese AF medication guideline, increased from 55.8% (48/86) to 71.1% (64/90) during the campaign period regardless of care coordination. Younger patients were referred to cardiovascular specialists for care coordination. Implementation of OAC therapy did not differ between patients with and without care coordination. Adherence to OAC therapy was low regardless of care coordination. CONCLUSIONS: This GP-targeted campaign was effective at raising awareness regarding the implementation of care coordination and appropriate OAC therapy at local clinical practices in Japan. Improvement of adherence to OAC therapy in elderly patients is a critical issue, and measures such as education programs targeted to patients and healthcare professionals should be undertaken.

Opinions of general and adult congenital heart disease cardiologists on care for adults with congenital heart disease in Belgium: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The growing adult congenital heart disease (CHD) population requires efficient healthcare organisation. It has been suggested that clinically appropriate care be provided for individual patients on the least complex level possible, in order to alleviate saturation of special care programmes. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 10 general and 10 adult CHD cardiologists were conducted to elucidate opinions on healthcare organisation in Belgium. A particular focus was placed on the potential role of general cardiologists. The software program NVivo 12 facilitated thematic analysis. RESULTS: A discrepancy existed between how general cardiologists thought about congenital care and what adult CHD cardiologists considered the minimum knowledge required to adequately treat patients. Qualitative data were categorised under the following themes: knowledge dissemination, certification, (de)centralisation of care, the role of adult CHD cardiologists, the role of dedicated nurse specialists, and patient referral. It appeared to be pivotal to organise care in such a way that providing basic care locally does not impede the generation of sufficient patient volume, and to continue improving communications between different care levels when there is no referral back. Moreover, practical knowledge is best disseminated locally. Cardiologists' opinions on certification and on the role of dedicated nurse specialists were mixed. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the results, we propose five recommendations for improving the provision of care to adults with CHD. A multidimensional approach to defining the role of different healthcare professionals, to improving communication channels, and to effectively sensitising healthcare professionals is needed to improve the organisation of care.

ECG pre-hospital teletransmission by emergency teams staffed with an emergency physician and paramedics and its impact on transportation and hospital admission.

Electrocardiography (ECG) is essential to detect and diagnose life threatening cardiac conditions and to determine further treatment. Correct interpretation of an ECG can be challenging, especially in the out-of-hospital setting and by less experienced emergency team members.The aim of this study was to compare the rate of ECG transmission from an out-of-hospital emergency scene to an in-hospital cardiologist on call in EMS-B and EMS-S providers and its impact on direct transportation to a cardiac catheterization laboratory and hospital admission.The study was designed as an observational study. Data from 3 separate emergency medical service teams were collected. Two teams are staffed by paramedics only (EMT-B), while another specialized team is staffed with an emergency physician (EMT-S). 5864 out-of-hospital emergencies were performed during a 12-month period and were analyzed for this study.In 124 out of 5864 (2.1%) out-of-hospital emergencies, an ECG transmission from the out-of-hospital scene to an in-hospital cardiologist on call was performed. Rate of transmission was similar between both teams (EMT-B n = 70, 2.2% vs EMT-S n = 54, 2.0%, P = .054). After coordinating with the cardiologist on call, 11 patients (15.7%) of the EMT-B (15.7%) and 24 patients (44.4%) of the EMT-S were directly transported from the scene of emergency to a cardiac catheterization laboratory (P < .001). Overall, 80% of patients treated by EMT-S, compared to 52.5% treated by the EMT-B required subsequent hospital admission (P < .05).Transmission of ECG from the out-of-hospital emergency scene to the in-hospital cardiologist is infrequently performed. The rate of STEMI in transmitted ECG's by emergency teams staffed with an emergency physician was higher compared to emergency teams staffed with paramedics only.

[The dawn era in the management of acute ischemic stroke and its health policy implications. Should interventional cardiologists be involved?] / La nuova era nel trattamento dell'ictus e le sue implicazioni socio-sanitarie. I cardiologi interventisti dovrebbero essere coinvolti?

Similarly to what happened for myocardial infarction treatment during the two previous decades, ischemic stroke therapy has radically changed in recent years after the encouraging clinical results on the use of mechanical revascularization systems. The ever-increasing use of thrombectomy, which is now the first-choice approach for achieving rapid reperfusion of the ischemic brain, inaugurates a new era in the treatment of ischemic stroke, with important social and healthcare implications and the need for effective integrated stroke networks on a regional basis.Given the high annual rates of stroke and that approximately 35% of strokes are caused by the thrombotic occlusion of a large cerebral vessel, with a treatment window reaching up to 24 h after onset in selected cases, the resources of interventional neuroradiology are not enough to meet treatment needs in terms of performing centers and number of operators. The possibility of using centers already active for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction has therefore been taken into consideration. This article presents objective data to support the validity of this strategy and discusses how to create treatment networks using the interventional skills of cardiologists with the implementation of multidisciplinary functional structures.

[Lifestyle, risk factors and prevention of cancer: role of the cardiologist]. / Stili di vita, fattori di rischio e prevenzione delle malattie oncologiche: il ruolo del cardiologo.

Although commonly thought of as two separate disease entities, cardiovascular diseases and cancer, the leading causes of death, possess various possible interactions, including a number of similar risk factors (e.g. obesity, diabetes, chronic inflammation). Each cardiologist should provide counseling for a correct lifestyle (diet, physical exercise, avoiding smoking and alcohol abuse); doing so, not only cardiovascular diseases, but also cancer could be prevented. Besides, intervention on diet, physical activity and smoking has been shown to be effective even in patients with known cancers. Many drugs used in cardiovascular prevention (i.e. aspirin, metformin, statins, and beta-blockers) have shown in vivo and in vitro promising pleiotropic properties, and, in observational studies, they were also effective in the prevention of some cancers, although this matter is controversial, emphasizing the need for interventional studies in the field of primary and secondary cancer prevention. Considerable interest has emerged regarding the potential adjuvant chemotherapeutic use of these drugs, but real-world epidemiological data remain inconclusive. In this review, we explore the risk factors common to both cardiovascular diseases and cancer, as well as the role of preventive cardiology treatments, highlighting the related major epidemiologic studies and potential biological mechanisms.

Educational needs and application of guidelines in the management of patients with mitral regurgitation. A European mixed-methods study.

Aims: To assess the knowledge and application of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines in the management of mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods and results: A mixed-methods educational needs assessment was performed. Following a qualitative phase (interviews), an online survey was undertaken using three case scenarios (asymptomatic severe primary MR, symptomatic severe primary MR in the elderly, and severe secondary MR) in 115 primary care physicians (PCPs), and 439 cardiologists or cardiac surgeons from seven European countries. Systematic cardiac auscultation was performed by only 54% of clinicians in asymptomatic patients. Cardiologists appropriately interpreted echocardiographic assessment of mechanism and quantification of primary MR (≥75%), but only 44% recognized secondary MR as severe. In asymptomatic severe primary MR with an indication for surgery, 27% of PCPs did not refer the patient to a cardiologist and medical therapy was overused by 19% of cardiologists. In the elderly patient with severe symptomatic primary MR, 72% of cardiologists considered mitral intervention (transcatheter edge-to-edge valve repair in 72%). In severe symptomatic secondary MR, optimization of medical therapy was advised by only 51% of PCPs and 33% of cardiologists, and surgery considered in 30% of cases (transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in 64%). Conclusion: Systematic auscultation is underused by PCPs for the early detection of MR. Medical therapy is overused in primary MR and underused in secondary MR. Indications for interventions are appropriate in most patients with primary MR, but are unexpectedly frequent for secondary MR. These gaps identify important targets for future educational programs.